Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
612-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

612-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023629 50.881115)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023501 50.881102,-1.023507 50.881127,-1.023525 50.881150,-1.023553 50.881168,-1.023588 50.881179,-1.023628 50.881184,-1.023667 50.881180,-1.023703 50.881169,-1.023732 50.881151,-1.023750 50.881129,-1.023757 50.881104,-1.023752 50.881079,-1.023734 50.881056,-1.023706 50.881038,-1.023670 50.881026,-1.023631 50.881022,-1.023591 50.881026,-1.023556 50.881037,-1.023527 50.881054,-1.023508 50.881077,-1.023501 50.881102)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL